Clause 13.1 ‘Right to Vary’ in FIDIC Yellow Book 1999

Introduction

Clause 13.1, commonly known as the “Right to Vary,” is a pivotal clause in the FIDIC Yellow Book 1999. It grants the Engineer the authority to instruct variations to the scope of the works under the contract. This clause is essential for both the Employer and the Contractor as it provides a structured mechanism for changes, thereby offering flexibility and adaptability in project execution.

Purpose and Implications

The primary purpose of Clause 13.1 Right to Vary is to create a structured mechanism that allows the Engineer to instruct Variations to the scope of work. The clause thus acts as a safeguard, ensuring that any changes to the original scope of work are not arbitrary but follow a well-defined procedural pathway. The clause is particularly useful in complex, long-term projects where changes are almost inevitable.

Implications Unpacked:

Contractor’s Obligation

The Contractor is bound to execute any Variations as instructed under Sub-Clause 13.1. This is a critical aspect, as it means that any changes initiated unilaterally by the Engineer can have far-reaching implications on the project’s budget, timeline, and even legal compliance.

Unforeseeable Work

The term “Unforeseeable” is especially significant. In the U.S., for instance, the doctrine of “impossibility” or “impracticability” in contract law could be invoked if executing a Variation becomes excessively burdensome or impossible due to unforeseen circumstances.

Legal and Safety Concerns

The clause explicitly mentions the Contractor’s obligations under Sub-Clause 4.8 (Health and Safety Obligations) and Sub-Clause 4.18 (Protection of the Environment). In the U.S., this would mean adhering to OSHA standards for worker safety and EPA regulations for environmental protection. Failure to comply could result in legal penalties, project delays, and reputational damage.

Performance Guarantees

The clause also highlights the potential impact of Variations on the Schedule of Performance Guarantees under Sub-Clause 4.1. This could affect the Contractor’s and Employer’s legal standing and may trigger penalty clauses if the performance guarantees are not met.

Primary Aspects

Engineer’s Authority

The Engineer holds a considerable degree of authority to initiate Variations, but this power is not absolute. The authority is explicitly confined to a timeframe that ends with the issuance of the Taking-Over Certificate for the Works.

Contractor’s Rights

The Contractor is not without recourse. They can challenge a Variation by providing “detailed supporting particulars” under specific conditions listed in the clause. This ensures a balanced power dynamic between the Engineer and Contractor.

Engineer’s Response

The Engineer has an obligation to respond promptly to the Contractor’s challenges, thereby ensuring that any disputes are resolved in a timely manner.

Expert Opinion

Legal experts often point out the importance of this clause as a dispute resolution mechanism, especially in the U.S. where litigation costs can skyrocket. Understanding the nuances of this clause can help parties anticipate issues and resolve them before they escalate into legal battles.

U.S. Specific Examples

1. Technical Standards: Any variation involving materials or processes would likely need to comply with relevant ANSI or ASTM standards.

2. Building Codes: If the Variation involves structural changes, it would need to be compliant with the International Building Code (IBC) and local building codes.

3. Environmental Laws: A Variation affecting emissions or waste management would require compliance with federal EPA regulations like the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.

Interactions of Clause 13.1 Right to Vary with Other Clauses

Clause 1.1.6.9 “Variation”

Clause 13.1 Right to Vary is intrinsically linked with Clause 1.1.6.9, which defines what a “Variation” is. Essentially, this foundational definition sets the stage for the rights and obligations outlined in Clause 13.1. Any change to the Employer’s Requirements or the Works that is instructed under Clause 13 falls under this definition.

Clause 3.1 “Engineer’s Duties”

Clause 13.1 Right to Vary grants significant powers to the Engineer to initiate Variations. However, the Engineer’s role is not just that of an initiator; it’s also one of a mediator and a facilitator as per Clause 3.1. The Engineer must act neutrally and fairly between both parties, and this duty extends to the initiation and management of Variations. The interaction between these clauses ensures checks and balances, mitigating the risk of arbitrary or unjust variations.

With Sub-Clause 4.1 [Contractor’s General Obligations]

Clause 13.1 also interacts with Sub-Clause 4.1 concerning the Contractor’s general obligations to complete the Works so that they are fit for their intended purpose. Any Variation instructed should not compromise the overall objective of the project as laid out in Sub-Clause 4.1.

Example in U.S. Context:

Suppose a Variation compromises the structural integrity of a building, making it non-compliant with ANSI or ASTM standards. In such a case, it would also conflict with the Contractor’s general obligations under Sub-Clause 4.1.

With Sub-Clause 4.8 [Health and Safety Obligations] and Sub-Clause 4.18 [Protection of the Environment]

Clause 13.1 provides the Contractor an opportunity to reject a Variation if it will adversely affect their ability to comply with health and safety or environmental protections. This creates a dynamic relationship between these clauses, safeguarding not just contractual interests but also public welfare.

Example in U.S. Context:

If a Variation would require the use of a material banned under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations, the Contractor can refuse to carry out that Variation, citing Sub-Clause 4.18.

Clause 8.4 “Variations and Adjustments”

While Clause 13.1 discusses the right to vary and the procedures to follow, Clause 8.4 delves into the consequential adjustments that might arise due to such variations. For example, if a Variation affects the timeline, it might necessitate adjustments to the contract price or the completion date. This clause is intrinsically tied to Clause 13.1, as any Variation is likely to have ripple effects on other contractual obligations and rights.

With Sub-Clause 11.4 [Failure to Remedy Defects]

Clause 13.1 Right to Vary explicitly states that, except as provided under Sub-Clause 11.4, a Variation shall not include the omission of any work to be carried out by the Employer or others. This is crucial as it delineates the boundaries within which Variations can occur, ensuring that the Contractor is not burdened with additional liabilities for defects that are not their responsibility.

Example in U.S. Context:

If a defect arises due to non-compliance with U.S. building codes, Sub-Clause 11.4 could kick in to mandate remedial action. In this case, the Engineer can’t instruct the Contractor to omit this work as a Variation under Clause 13.1.

Clause 13.2 “Value Engineering”

This clause provides a contrast to Clause 13.1 by allowing the Contractor to submit proposals that could mutually benefit both the Contractor and the Employer. It adds a layer of collaboration, allowing for flexibility and potential cost savings or performance improvements.

Clause 13.3 “Variation Procedure”

This is a pivotal clause that outlines the procedural steps for executing variations, including those initiated under Clause 13.1. It provides a comprehensive framework detailing how variations are to be valued, authorized, and executed, thereby ensuring both parties are on the same page.

Clause 13.7 “Adjustments for Changes in Legislation”

This clause is particularly relevant as it adjusts the Contract Price based on changes in laws that affect the Contractor’s performance. A change in legislation could very well trigger a variation under Clause 13.1, making this clause an important consideration in the contract’s overall risk management.

Clause 14.3 “Application for Interim Payment Certificates”

This clause interacts with Clause 13.1 when it comes to financial aspects. It is the stage where the Contractor submits priced statements for resources used in variations, thereby linking the financial implications directly back to Clause 13.1.

Shared Effects with Other Clauses

Clause 1.1.6.9 “Variation” and Clause 13.1

• Shared Effect: Both clauses collectively define and regulate what constitutes a Variation in the project scope. The definitions and procedures are tightly intertwined, ensuring clarity and preventing disputes over what qualifies as a Variation.

Clause 13.2 “Value Engineering” and Clause 13.1

• Shared Effect: While Clause 13.1 focuses on Engineer-initiated Variations, Clause 13.2 allows for Contractor-initiated suggestions. The shared effect is a more holistic approach to project modifications, allowing inputs from both parties.

Clause 13.3 “Variation Procedure” and Clause 13.1

• Shared Effect: Both clauses operate in tandem to provide a complete procedural framework for Variations. While Clause 13.1 gives the ‘why’ and ‘when,’ Clause 13.3 provides the ‘how,’ creating a seamless process for introducing and executing Variations.

Clause 13.7 “Adjustments for Changes in Legislation” and Clause 13.1

• Shared Effect: Both clauses deal with adjustments to the contract, whether due to Variations or legislative changes. This creates a unified framework for adjusting the Contract Price and other contractual obligations.

Clause 14.3 “Application for Interim Payment Certificates” and Clause 13.1

• Shared Effect: These clauses jointly cover the financial aspects of Variations. Clause 14.3 ensures that Variations under Clause 13.1 are appropriately priced and accounted for in interim payments.

Clause 3.1 “Engineer’s Duties” and Clause 13.1

• Shared Effect: The Engineer’s duties under Clause 3.1 extend to the fair and impartial management of Variations under Clause 13.1, ensuring that Variations are not only technically sound but also equitable.

Clause 8.4 “Variations and Adjustments” and Clause 13.1

• Shared Effect: Clause 8.4 outlines the repercussions of Variations on project timelines and costs. This complements Clause 13.1 by addressing the after-effects of any Variations, thereby providing a more comprehensive understanding of their impact.

Key Points to Keep in Mind for Clause 13.1 Right to Vary

1. Timing is Crucial

The Engineer can initiate Variations only up to the point of the issuance of the Taking-Over Certificate. Post that, this clause cannot be invoked.

2. Contractor’s Right to Challenge

The Contractor can challenge a Variation under specific conditions outlined in the clause, such as if the work is “Unforeseeable” or if it would affect compliance with health, safety, or environmental regulations.

3. Financial Implications

Always consider the financial implications of Variations, especially when it comes to adjustments in the Contract Price or the filing of Interim Payment Certificates.

4. Compliance with U.S. Regulations

In the U.S. context, ensure that any Variations comply with local and federal regulations, including OSHA standards for safety, EPA regulations for environmental protection, and ANSI or ASTM standards for materials and processes.

5. Interactions with Other Clauses

Be aware of how Clause 13.1 interacts with other clauses like Clauses 13.3, 13.7, 14.3, 3.1, and 8.4. These interactions can have a ripple effect on various aspects of the contract, including financials, timelines, and legal obligations.

6. Legal Repercussions

Understand that Variations can have legal repercussions, especially if they affect the project’s compliance with laws or regulations. Always consult the legal team before agreeing to or initiating a Variation.

7. Multiple Ways to Initiate Variations

Be aware that Clause 13.1 is just one of the three ways Variations can be initiated, as per Clause 13: Variations and Adjustments. The three methods are:

• Engineer-Initiated: Under Sub-Clause 13.1, the Engineer may initiate a Variation without prior agreement on feasibility or price.
• Contractor-Initiated: Under Sub-Clause 13.2, the Contractor can propose Variations that are mutually beneficial.
• Collaborative Approach: Under Sub-Clause 13.3, the Engineer may request a proposal from the Contractor, aiming for prior agreement to minimize disputes.

Case Studies Concerning Clause 13.1 Right to Vary

Case Study 1: The Infrastructure Upgrade

Scenario:

A U.S.-based construction company was contracted to upgrade an existing highway. During the project, the local government passed a new environmental law requiring the use of eco-friendly materials for public infrastructure projects.

Application of Clause 13.1:

The Engineer initiated a Variation under Clause 13.1 Right to Vary to comply with the new environmental law. This was in line with Clause 13.7, which adjusts the Contract Price based on changes in laws affecting the Contractor’s performance.

Outcome:

The Variation led to an increase in project costs, but it was executed smoothly, avoiding legal complications. This Variation was initiated by the Engineer under Sub-Clause 13.1, without prior agreement on feasibility or price.

Case Study 2: The Unforeseen Geological Condition

Scenario:

While constructing a residential complex, the Contractor encountered an unforeseen geological condition that made the initial foundation design unfeasible.

Application of Clause 13.1:

The Contractor promptly gave a Notice to the Engineer, stating that the varied work was “Unforeseeable” and would adversely affect the project’s compliance with ANSI standards for building foundations.

Outcome:

The Engineer responded by canceling the initial Variation and instructing a new one that accounted for the geological condition, thereby preventing a potential construction failure.

Case Study 3: The Expansion of Project Scope

Scenario:

Midway through the construction of a shopping mall, the Employer wanted to add an additional floor for a new tenant.

Application of Clause 13.1:

The Engineer initiated a Variation under Clause 13.1 to expand the project scope. However, the Contractor challenged this, citing it would affect their ability to comply with OSHA safety regulations.

Outcome:

The Engineer confirmed the Variation but also agreed to extend the project timeline and adjust the Contract Price, ensuring compliance with safety regulations.

Case Study 4: The Introduction of Value Engineering

Scenario:

During a hospital construction project, the Contractor suggested a new HVAC system that would be more efficient but also more expensive initially.

Application of Clause 13.1 and Clause 13.2:

Although Clause 13.1 allows only the Engineer to initiate Variations, Clause 13.2 (Value Engineering) enabled the Contractor to propose this beneficial change. The Engineer assessed and approved it as a Variation under Clause 13.1.

Outcome:

The Variation was executed, leading to long-term energy savings that outweighed the initial increased cost. This Variation was initiated by the Contractor under Sub-Clause 13.2, aiming for mutual benefits.

Checklist for Execution, Deployment, and Supervision of Clause 13.1

Task	Responsible Party	Deadline	Status
Receive written instruction for variation	Contractor	[Date]	[Status]
Review and approve engineering drawings	Engineer	[Date]	[Status]
Update project schedule	Project Manager	[Date]	[Status]
Re-calculate project budget	Accountant	[Date]	[Status]
Issue payment for variation work	Employer	[Date]	[Status]

Checklist for Applying and Overseeing Clause 13.1

Task	Responsible Party	Deadline	Status
Confirm receipt of variation instruction	Contractor	[Date]	[Status]
Evaluate impact on existing work	Engineer	[Date]	[Status]
Update risk assessment	Project Manager	[Date]	[Status]
Approve additional costs	Accountant	[Date]	[Status]
Monitor implementation of variation	Engineer	[Date]	[Status]

Checklist to Guide and Monitor the Execution of Clause 13.1

Task	Responsible Party	Deadline	Status
Document all communications related to variation	Contractor	[Date]	[Status]
Verify quality of variation work	Engineer	[Date]	[Status]
Update stakeholders on variation impact	Project Manager	[Date]	[Status]
Finalize payment adjustments	Accountant	[Date]	[Status]
Close out variation instruction	Engineer	[Date]	[Status]

Sample Letters

Letter from Engineer to Contractor for Variation Instruction

[Date]
[Contractor’s Address]

Subject: Instruction for Variation under Clause 13.1

Dear [Contractor’s Name],

In accordance with Clause 13.1 of the Contract, we hereby instruct you to [describe the specific variation, reasons, and implications].

This variation will result in [impact on project schedule, cost, and potential risks or changes to the scope of work].

Please proceed with the necessary changes as per the attached [engineering drawings, specifications, or calculations].

The financial implications of this variation are as follows: [detailed breakdown of the financial implications, including any cost changes, payment terms, and potential adjustments to the project budget].

Kindly acknowledge receipt of this instruction and confirm your agreement to proceed.

Sincerely,
[Engineer’s Name]
[Engineer’s Position]

Letter from Contractor to Engineer Acknowledging Variation

[Date]
[Engineer’s Address]

Subject: Acknowledgment of Variation under Clause 13.1

Dear [Engineer’s Name],

We acknowledge receipt of your instruction for variation dated [Date of Engineer’s Letter]. We agree to proceed with the changes as instructed.

We understand the implications of this variation on the project schedule, cost, and scope of work and will take necessary actions accordingly.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
[Contractor’s Name]
[Contractor’s Position]

Sequence Diagram

Right Click and Open in New Windows to See the Flow Chart Clearly:

Detailed Breakdown of the Sequence Diagram

1. Engineer’s Authority (Engineer): Initiates the sequence by sending a message to the Contractor to initiate changes.

2. Contractor’s Responsibilities (Contractor): Acknowledges the changes and informs the Engineer.

3. Engineer’s Authority (Engineer): Sends a message to the Employer about the cost and time implications of the initiated changes.

4. Employer’s Obligations (Employer): Approves or denies the changes based on the cost and time implications.

5. Engineer’s Authority (Engineer): Informs the Contractor to implement the changes.

6. Contractor’s Responsibilities (Contractor): Sends a message to the Employer about any additional costs incurred due to the changes.

7. Employer’s Obligations (Employer): Grants time extensions if necessary.

Flowcharts

---

---