Nominated Subcontractors – Clause 4.5 of FIDIC 1999 vs 2017

74 / 100 SEO Score

Views in the last 30 days: 115

Estimated read time: 9 minute(s)

🔍 Understanding Clause 4.5 – Nominated Subcontractors (FIDIC Yellow Book 2017)

Let’s take a deep and practical dive into Clause 4.5 – Nominated Subcontractors from the FIDIC Yellow Book, with a spotlight on the 2017 edition (and a nod to the 1999 version for perspective). This isn’t just about dry legal theory—we’re going to break down what this clause means on real projects, how it evolved, where it causes friction, and how smart teams navigate it. Whether you’re a contracts manager, a project engineer, or just FIDIC-curious, this section is here to make Clause 4.5 clear, useful, and maybe even a little engaging.

Clause 4.5 governs the Employer’s authority to nominate Subcontractors to be engaged by the Contractor for certain portions of the Works. Unlike ordinary Subcontractors chosen by the Contractor at their discretion under Clause 4.4, these are third parties imposed or recommended by the Employer—usually due to specialized expertise, proprietary technology, regulatory requirements, or cost considerations. Clause 4.5 ensures this nomination process includes safeguards to maintain commercial fairness and protect the Contractor from undue liability or impractical obligations. The clause also attempts to balance the Employer’s control with the Contractor’s need for risk management.

📘 What changed in the 2017 version compared to 1999?

The 2017 edition introduced more explicit risk allocation provisions and required more transparent procedures around nominations. It also placed more emphasis on the Contractor’s right to object and clearly laid out the criteria for doing so.

⚠️ Where does Clause 4.5 typically cause friction?

Common issues include delay due to nominated subcontractor non-performance, price disputes, and unclear liability when nominated subcontractors fail to meet specifications. These conflicts often arise when nomination is done late or without proper vetting.

✅ How do experienced teams manage Clause 4.5 effectively?

Proactive contract review, early objection if risks are excessive, and insisting on clear documentation of scope, liability, and timelines for nominated subcontractors help reduce issues. Some teams also include performance bonds or step-in rights in subcontractor terms.

🕰️ Historical Context: From 1999 to 2017

1999 Yellow Book
Minimalist Clause
Engineer could instruct Contractor to employ a nominated Subcontractor.
Embedded in Clause 13 – treated as a Variation.
Lacked process detail: No clear objection steps, payment guidance, or risk allocation.
Breeding ground for disputes!
2017 Yellow Book
Major Upgrade
Split into three procedural sub-clauses:
4.5.1 Objection
4.5.2 Payments
4.5.3 Evidence
More clarity, less risk
Structured & time-bound objection:
  • 14-day window for Contractor to issue a Notice of objection after Engineer’s instruction.
  • Objection must be justified with supporting particulars (e.g., technical, financial, or indemnity grounds).
  • Employer can override objection if indemnity is provided for the Subcontractor’s default/negligence.
Balance: Contractor isn’t forced into bad deals, Employer keeps control for key works.

🧩 Clause Breakdown – 2017 Edition

Main Definition:
Nominated Subcontractor = Named in Employer’s Requirements or nominated by Engineer under Clause 13.4 [Provisional Sums].
“The Contractor shall not be under any obligation to employ a nominated Subcontractor against whom he makes a reasonable objection by Notice to the Engineer within 14 days after receiving the Engineer’s instruction.”
(Clause 4.5.1)
4.5.1 – Objection to Nomination
  • 14 days to issue Notice of objection with “supporting particulars”.
  • Valid objections:
    • Lack of resources/qualifications/financial soundness
    • Missing indemnity or equivalent obligations in subcontract
Click or tap to view the direct clause wording ⟳
Employer’s Indemnity Override:
If Employer indemnifies Contractor…
“If, however, the Employer indemnifies the Contractor against and from the consequences of the nominated Subcontractor’s default or negligence… then the Contractor shall not be entitled to object on these grounds.”
4.5.2 – Payments to Nominated Subcontractors
  • Contractor is responsible for payment
  • Amounts included in Contract Price via Clause 13.4(b)
  • Engineer certifies under the IPC process
Click or tap to view the direct clause wording ⟳
“Unless otherwise stated in the Contract, the amounts payable to a nominated Subcontractor shall be included in the Contract Price in accordance with Sub-Clause 13.4(b) [Provisional Sums].”
4.5.3 – Evidence of Payments
  • Engineer may request payment evidence
  • If Contractor fails or cannot justify withholding, Employer may pay directly
  • Deducted from the next IPC
Click or tap to view the direct clause wording ⟳
“If the Contractor fails to submit such evidence or fails to justify non-payment, the Employer may (at its sole discretion) pay the nominated Subcontractor directly… and shall be entitled to deduct the same from the Contract Price or recover the same from the Contractor.”

🔗 Interacting Clauses and Cross-References

🤝 Clause 4.4 Subcontractors
What it covers: General terms for Contractor-selected Subcontractors. Full Contractor autonomy and responsibility for all Subcontractors’ acts and defaults.
Why it matters for 4.5:
Under 4.5, the Employer may bear partial risk (via indemnity) for nominated Subcontractors—unlike in 4.4, where risk always stays with the Contractor.
💸 Clause 13.4 Provisional Sums
What it covers: The mechanism for incorporating nominated Subcontractor costs into the Contract Price (especially via Sub-Clause 13.4(b)).
Why it matters for 4.5:
Enables Clause 4.5 payments—if not allocated in 13.4, nominated Subcontractors can’t be properly paid or tracked.
📄 Clause 14.6.1 Issue of Interim Payment Certificates
What it covers: How the Engineer certifies payments under the Contract, including deductions for direct Employer payments to nominated Subcontractors (per 4.5.3).
Why it matters for 4.5:
Enforces financial accountability if the Employer pays a Subcontractor directly, ensuring deductions and compliance.
⚖️ Clause 3.7 Agreement or Determination
What it covers: The process for resolving disputes or disagreements—Engineer must consult both Parties, then determine the outcome if no agreement.
Why it matters for 4.5:
Used when Contractor objects to a nomination under 4.5.1—ensures due process, not just unilateral decision-making.
📝 Clauses 20 & 21 Claims, Disputes, Arbitration
What it covers: Claims process, dispute escalation (Clause 20), and final arbitration/DAAB recourse (Clause 21) for unresolved issues.
Why it matters for 4.5:
Allows claims and dispute escalation if nomination, indemnity, or Engineer’s determinations cause time/cost impacts or remain contested.

Process Flowcharts concerning [Clause 4.5 Nominated Subcontractors]

This flowchart provides a step-by-step visual representation of the process a contractor might follow when proposing a nominated subcontractor under a FIDIC contract. It emphasizes the importance of obtaining approval from the Employer, ensuring compliance with FIDIC terms, and adjusting plans if necessary.

Nominated Subcontractors

📄 Sample Letters for Clause 4.5 Nominated Subcontractors

✉️ Objection (4.5.1) Notice of Objection to Nomination
“Formal objection by the Contractor—must be sent within 14 days with supporting particulars.”
Subject: Notice of Objection to Nominated Subcontractor
Date: [Insert Date]
To: The Engineer
Project: [Project Name / Contract Number]

Dear [Engineer’s Name],

Pursuant to Sub-Clause 4.5.1 of the Conditions of Contract, we hereby submit our formal objection to the nomination of [Subcontractor Name], as instructed in your letter dated [Insert Date of Instruction].

Our objection is based on the following grounds:

Lack of Financial Capacity: According to our due diligence, the proposed Subcontractor has been subject to recent credit rating downgrades and is facing outstanding legal claims.
Insufficient Technical Resources: The Subcontractor lacks sufficient qualified personnel for the specialized nature of the works.
Contractual Terms: The proposed subcontract does not contain adequate indemnification clauses or equivalent obligations as required under the main Contract.

Attached are the supporting documents and financial due diligence reports referenced above.

We respectfully request that the nomination be reconsidered or that the Employer provide a written indemnity pursuant to Clause 4.5.1.

Yours faithfully,
[Authorized Signatory]
[Contractor’s Name]
📑 Evidence (4.5.3) Request for Evidence of Payment
“Engineer’s formal request—if evidence is not provided, direct payment by Employer may follow.”
Subject: Request for Evidence of Payment to Nominated Subcontractor
Date: [Insert Date]
To: [Contractor’s Name]

Dear [Contractor’s Representative],

In accordance with Sub-Clause 4.5.3 of the Contract, please provide documentary evidence confirming payment of the certified amounts to the nominated Subcontractor, [Subcontractor Name], for work executed under IPC No. [Insert IPC Number].

This evidence should be submitted within [Insert Number] days of this letter. Failure to do so, or failure to justify non-payment, may result in direct payment by the Employer and deduction from subsequent Interim Payment Certificates, as allowed under the Contract.

Kind regards,
[Engineer’s Name]
[Company Name]
🏦 Direct Pay (4.5.3) Employer’s Notice of Direct Payment
“Employer notifies Contractor of intent to pay Subcontractor directly and recover the sum.”
Subject: Notice of Direct Payment to Nominated Subcontractor
Date: [Insert Date]
To: [Contractor’s Name]

Dear [Contractor’s Representative],

We refer to the Engineer’s request dated [Insert Date] for evidence of payment to [Subcontractor Name] and your response (or lack thereof).

As you have not provided sufficient evidence or justification for non-payment, and in accordance with Sub-Clause 4.5.3, the Employer has determined to make direct payment to the nominated Subcontractor.

The amount of [Insert Amount] will be deducted from your upcoming IPC or otherwise recovered as permitted under the Contract.

Sincerely,
[Employer’s Representative Name]
[Employer’s Organization]

✔️ Checklist for Nominated Subcontractors (Clause 4.5)

Progress
0 of 10 tasks complete
Task / Activity Responsible Party Remarks
Review the nomination of the Subcontractor by the Employer. Contractor Why?
Raise any objections to the nomination, if necessary. Contractor Why?
Review and finalize the subcontract agreement with the nominated Subcontractor. Contractor & Subcontractor Why?
Monitor the performance of the nominated Subcontractor. Contractor Why?
Ensure timely payments to the nominated Subcontractor. Contractor Why?
Handle any disputes or issues with the nominated Subcontractor. Contractor & Engineer Why?
Review and approve any design or specifications provided by the nominated Subcontractor. Engineer Why?
Ensure proper communication and coordination between the main Contractor and the nominated Subcontractor. Contractor Why?
Document all interactions, instructions, and decisions related to the nominated Subcontractor. Contractor & Engineer Why?
Conduct a final review and sign-off once the nominated Subcontractor completes their scope of work. Contractor & Engineer Why?

💡 For a deeper dive into the legal and procedural aspects of Employer direct payments, check out our companion article: Can Employers Pay Subcontractors Directly Under FIDIC Contracts? A Detailed Exploration.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top