Clause 4.6 [Co-operation] in the FIDIC Yellow Book

Table of Contents

75 / 100

SEO Score

Views in the last 30 days: 82

Estimated read time: 9 minute(s)

🔗 Clause 4.6 – Co-operation Across the Project Site

Clause 4.6 in both the 1999 and 2017 editions of the FIDIC Yellow Book emphasizes one core message: “You’re not alone on site.”

“The Contractor shall, as necessary, give full and active co-operation in all matters affecting the execution of the Works and the co-ordination of all parties on the Site.”

Think of this clause as the operating manual for smooth co-existence on complex infrastructure projects. Whether you’re working alongside utility companies, government agencies, or other contractors, this clause ensures everything ticks along without stepping on toes.

🛠️ Why It’s a Big Deal:

⚖️ Promotes collaborative governance among stakeholders
🚧 Minimizes site disruption and conflicts
🔁 Supports staged handovers and access sharing
🌐 Crucial for PPP projects and urban infrastructure with multiple interfaces

In both editions, the responsibility falls on the Contractor to make sure that all logistical, technical, and safety coordination with third parties is effectively managed—this includes public utilities, Employer’s teams, and even emergency responders.

This clause also links naturally with:

By enforcing Clause 4.6, the FIDIC contract essentially acts as a backstage coordinator—making sure every performer shows up, shares the stage, and doesn’t trip over someone else’s cables. 🎭

🕰️ Clause 4.6 in Evolution – What Changed from 1999 to 2017?

The update in the 2017 FIDIC Yellow Book reflects modern realities of multi-party coordination on site. Below is a side-by-side view of how Clause 4.6 evolved to meet these challenges:

Feature	1999 Edition	2017 Edition
Clause Title	Co-operation	Co-operation
Language Style	General, high-level obligation to “allow appropriate opportunities”	Detailed obligations with a focus on coordination, shared use, and entitlement rights
Entitlement Framing	Instruction may be considered a Variation (and give rise to Cost) if it causes Unforeseeable Cost	Unforeseeable coordination causes trigger entitlement to EOT and/or Cost Plus Profit (clearly articulated)
Initiation Mechanism	Based on Contract specification or Engineer’s instruction	Based on Employer’s Requirements or Engineer’s instruction
Coordination Duty	General obligation to allow others to work	Explicit duty to allow work, share facilities, and proactively coordinate using reasonable endeavours

🧠 Did you know?
The 2017 update was shaped by industry feedback citing increased complexity in modern infrastructure delivery. It now provides clearer guardrails for managing interface risks and reinforces the Contractor’s right to seek additional time or cost when coordination challenges arise.

🧩 Clause 4.6 Breakdown – Then vs Now

🔹 1999 Edition Highlights

“The Contractor shall, as specified in the Contract or as instructed by the Engineer, allow appropriate opportunities for carrying out work to:

the Employer’s Personnel,

any other contractors employed by the Employer,

the personnel of any legally constituted public authorities…

Any such instruction shall constitute a Variation if and to the extent that it causes the Contractor to incur Unforeseeable Cost.”

📎 Obligation is reactive, based on Engineer instruction or contract text.
🌀 Term “appropriate opportunities” is open to interpretation.
💸 Cost entitlement only possible via Variation, requires proof of being “Unforeseeable”.

🔹 2017 Edition Enhancements

“The Contractor shall, as specified in the Employer’s Requirements or as instructed by the Engineer:

allow appropriate opportunities for carrying out work, and for the use of Contractor’s Equipment or access,

for the Employer’s Personnel, other contractors, and public authorities…

The Contractor shall use all reasonable endeavours to coordinate operations… Entitled to EOT and/or Cost Plus Profit if Unforeseeable.”

✅ Proactive obligation to coordinate and share facilities.
🔁 Shared use of Contractor’s equipment and access now explicitly included.
🔓 Dual entitlement: time + cost + profit (if disruption was Unforeseeable).
📘 Clear reference to Sub-Clause 20.2 for claims process.

🔧 Real-Life Application: Urban Highway Project (New York)

Project: Design-build for a highway interchange in New York City

📞 Contractor must coordinate with utility providers (telecom, gas, water) for trench access.
🚦 Smart traffic systems are being installed by another contractor under a separate DOT contract.
🏛️ Public authorities require periodic access to inspect and approve works.

📜 How Clause 4.6 Applies

🔹 Under 1999 Edition:

Contractor can only claim Cost if the Engineer’s instruction led to delay and the impact was Unforeseeable.
No automatic entitlement to Profit.

🔹 Under 2017 Edition:

If coordination needs weren’t specified upfront, any delays caused by utility clashes or re-sequencing give the Contractor rights to:
📆 Extension of Time (EOT)
💰 Cost + Profit (e.g., inefficiencies, overtime, resource shuffle)

🧠 Insight: This real-world comparison highlights how the 2017 update gives Contractors stronger tools for managing coordination risks—especially vital in dense urban environments like NYC, where multi-agency access is common.

📌 Interacting Clauses – How They Connect with Clause 4.6

Clause 1.1 – Definitions (Key to Understanding Clause 4.6)

🔍 “Unforeseeable” is defined here as something not reasonably foreseeable by an experienced Contractor at the Base Date.

💰 “Cost” includes actual expenditures but excludes profit unless expressly permitted (important for 4.6 entitlements).

⚙️ “Contractor’s Equipment” must be shared under 4.6, and its definition affects how that’s interpreted contractually.

Clause 13.3 – Variation Procedure

📋 In the 1999 edition, if the Engineer’s coordination instruction causes Unforeseeable Cost, it’s treated as a Variation under this clause.

⚖️ Defines how those Variations are valued and implemented, critical when assessing whether Clause 4.6 instructions qualify for compensation.

Clause 20.2 (2017) / Clause 20.1 (1999) – Claims

🧾 Provides the procedural roadmap for Contractors to submit claims for EOT and Cost under Clause 4.6.

✅ The 2017 edition directly links Clause 4.6 coordination disruptions to this claim mechanism—including Cost plus Profit.

Clause 4.20 – Progress Reports

📈 Progress reports are essential evidence for tracking coordination impacts related to Clause 4.6.

🛠️ Regular updates help demonstrate causation between site events and delays or additional cost incurred.

Clause 4.10 – Use of Site Data

📁 Site data may reveal known risks (like concurrent contracts or public works) that affect the foreseeability argument under Clause 4.6.

🚫 Incomplete or inaccurate data could help prove a disruption was genuinely Unforeseeable—supporting a Contractor’s claim.

⚠️ Common Challenges & Solutions

🌀

Problem 1: Vague Obligations

Challenge: Ambiguity around “appropriate opportunities” or what counts as “Contractor’s Equipment”.

✅ Solution: Define clear access protocols in the Employer’s Requirements and include detailed schedules in appendices.

🛠️

Problem 2: Unforeseeability Disputes

Challenge: Contractor claims coordination delays were unforeseeable; Employer disagrees.

🛠 Solution: Mandate interface risk logs in proposals and require written documentation of assumptions at tender stage.

🚧

Problem 3: Conflicting Access Needs

Challenge: Access conflicts cause sequencing delays or safety risks.

🚧 Solution: Integrate a Site Interface Management Plan (SIMP) into the contract and project controls.

🧭 Clause 4.6 Flowchart: Co-operation Workflow Explained

Clause 4.6 Flowchart – Co-operation Process

🔹 Start

The process begins when the Contractor receives an Engineer’s instruction regarding co-operation.

📨 Receive Engineer’s Instruction

Contractor is instructed to allow work access to other stakeholders like Employer’s Personnel, other contractors, or public authorities.

🔍 Check for Unforeseeable Cost

Contractor assesses whether the instruction results in unforeseeable costs.

✅ If Yes → Variation Triggered

The instruction qualifies as a Variation. Contractor must prepare a Variation Proposal.

➡️ If No → Proceed as Instructed

Contractor continues with coordination and access provisions without variation claim.

📝 Submit Variation Proposal

For Variation cases, Contractor submits proposal with details on cost, time, and impact.

👷 Allow Access to Stakeholders

Access is given regardless of Variation status—to Employer’s team, other contractors, or authorities.

🤝 Coordinate with Other Contractors

Contractor aligns schedules and site logistics as per Employer’s Requirements.

📂 Submit Documents to Engineer

All necessary coordination-related documentation is sent to the Engineer for record and compliance.

🏁 End

The co-operation cycle concludes when all access, coordination, and reporting tasks are fulfilled.

📨 Sample Letters – Clause 4.6 Scenarios

📩 Sample Letter 1: Request for Co-operation Guidance

[Contractor’s Company Letterhead] [Date] [Employer’s Name] [Employer’s Address] Subject: Request for Clarity on Co-operation as per Clause 4.6 of FIDIC Contract Dear [Employer’s Name], As we progress with the [Project Name], we seek your guidance on the expected co-operation under **Clause 4.6 Co-operation**. Specifically, we would like to understand how we are to co-ordinate our activities with other contractors or public authorities involved in the project. Your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Position]

📑 Sample Letter 2: Notification of Unforeseeable Costs

[Contractor’s Company Letterhead] [Date] [Employer’s Name] [Engineer’s Name] [Addresses] Subject: Notification of Unforeseeable Costs under Clause 4.6 of FIDIC Contract Dear [Employer’s and Engineer’s Names], During the co-operation process with [Other Contractor/Public Authority], we have incurred Unforeseeable Costs not accounted for in the initial contract. As per **Clause 4.6 Co-operation**, we are notifying you of these costs and formally requesting a Variation to address them. Attached are the details of the costs incurred. We request your urgent attention to this matter. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Position]

📨 Sample Letter 3: Employer’s Instruction for Co-operation

[Employer’s Company Letterhead] [Date] [Contractor’s Name] [Contractor’s Address] Subject: Instructions for Co-operation under Clause 4.6 of FIDIC Contract Dear [Contractor’s Name], As per **Clause 4.6 Co-operation**, we instruct you to co-operate with [Other Contractor/Public Authority] for [Specific Task]. Please ensure that you provide appropriate opportunities for carrying out this work, as stipulated in the clause. Your co-operation is crucial for the smooth execution of the project. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Position]

✅ Clause 4.6 Checklists – Execute, Apply & Monitor with Confidence

🧭 Checklist 1: Execution, Deployment & Supervision

Task	Responsible Party	Deadline	Status Update	Documentation	Cost Estimate	Training Program	Ethical Considerations
Identify relevant parties	Project Manager	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Cost]	[Training Name]	Fair selection of personnel
Establish communication lines	Communication Team	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Cost]	[Training Name]	Transparent communication
Define roles & responsibilities	HR	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Cost]	Orientation program	Equal opportunity for all
Integrate cooperation requirements	Planning Team	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Cost]	[Training Name]	Adherence to project ethics
Monitor cooperation efforts	Quality Control	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Cost]	Monitoring workshop	Ethical monitoring practices

📌 Checklist 2: Application & Oversight

Task	Responsible Party	Deadline	Status Update	Documentation	Feedback Mechanism
Provide opportunities for Employer’s Personnel	Contractor	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Feedback Channel]
Coordinate with other contractors	Contractor	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Feedback Channel]
Facilitate work for public authorities	Contractor	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Feedback Channel]
Address any arising conflicts	Mediation Team	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Feedback Channel]
Review cooperation efforts	Review Team	[Date]	[Status]	[Document Name]	[Feedback Channel]

📊 Checklist 3: Monitoring & Evaluation

Task	Responsible Party	Start Date	End Date	Monitoring Mechanism	Challenges	Solutions
Establish collaboration framework	Planning Team	[Start]	[End]	[Monitoring Tool]	[Challenge]	[Solution]
Train all parties on cooperation requirements	HR	[Start]	[End]	[Monitoring Tool]	[Challenge]	[Solution]
Regularly update on cooperation progress	Communication Team	[Start]	[End]	[Monitoring Tool]	[Challenge]	[Solution]
Address any technical concerns	Technical Team	[Start]	[End]	[Monitoring Tool]	[Challenge]	[Solution]
Evaluate the effectiveness of cooperation	Quality Control	[Start]	[End]	[Monitoring Tool]	[Challenge]	[Solution]

Clause 4.6 [Co-operation] in the FIDIC Yellow Book 1999 vs 2017