Views in the last 30 days: 102
Estimated read time: 30 minute(s)
🔍 Breakdown of the Clause – Let’s Get Into the Details!
📘 FIDIC Yellow Book 1999 – Clause 13.4 [Payment in Applicable Currencies]
“Where the Contract provides for payment of the Contract Price in more than one currency, the proportion of each currency in which the Contract Price is to be paid shall be specified in the Appendix to Tender, and the payment of each such proportion shall be made in that currency.”
📗 FIDIC Yellow Book 2017 – Sub-Clause 14.15 [Currencies of Payment]
“Payment of the amounts due to the Contractor shall be made in the currencies and proportions set out in the Contract. The Contractor shall provide details of the bank accounts into which the payments are to be made, in the relevant currencies. The Employer shall pay the Contractor by direct transfer into these bank accounts.”
✍️ Side-by-Side Visual Summary
📘 1999 – Clause 13.4 | 📗 2017 – Sub-Clause 14.15 |
---|---|
Focuses on what currencies to pay | Focuses on what, where, and how to pay |
No mention of bank accounts | Requires Contractor’s account details for each currency |
Doesn’t specify payment method | Must pay by direct bank transfer |
Basic currency protection | Robust for real-world project execution |
1999: Like a handshake—“Sure, we’ll pay in USD and INR.”
2017: Like a legal checklist—“Which bank? Which currency? Direct transfer, no delays.”
Key Interpretations and Implications
Let’s face it: in international projects, money rarely flows in just one currency. When currency management goes wrong, it leads to real headaches — not just inconvenience, but disputes, payment delays, and sometimes even contract termination. That’s why these clauses, though brief, have serious contractual weight.
✅ Fundamental Interpretation – The Common Ground
- Both Clause 13.4 (1999) and Sub-Clause 14.15 (2017) require the Contractor to be paid in exactly the mix of currencies defined in the Contract.
- They place a strict obligation on the Employer to respect this split — it’s a contractual commandment, not a suggestion.
- The goal? Shield the Contractor from FX risks if the Employer tries to pay only in local currency.
🔄 Evolution from 1999 to 2017 – What’s New and Why?
Feature / Focus | 1999 – Clause 13.4 | 2017 – Sub-Clause 14.15 |
---|---|---|
Currency Proportion Enforcement | ✔️ Yes | ✔️ Yes |
Reference to Tender Appendix / Contract Data | ✔️ Yes | ✔️ Yes |
Operational Clarity (bank accounts, transfer method) | ❌ Absent | ✅ Clearly stated |
Direct Transfer Requirement | ❌ Not mentioned | ✅ Mandatory |
Contractor’s Obligation to Provide Account Details | ❌ Silent | ✅ Explicit |
Dispute Avoidance Tools | Minimal | Stronger enforcement language |
The 1999 clause works in principle, but leaves gaps. The 2017 update transforms the principle into an actionable process — a big leap in reducing disputes and improving accountability.
⚖️ Who Bears the Risk?
If the Employer pays only in local currency (by mistake or design), the Contractor has to chase for the correct payment or raise a claim. There’s no guidance on who eats the bank fees or covers FX changes if conversions are needed — opening the door to Employer “excuses” (“Bank wouldn’t process EUR today, sorry!”).
The Employer must pay directly into designated accounts, in the relevant currency. If the Contractor doesn’t provide an account, payment can be justifiably withheld. The direct transfer process makes payments traceable and disputes far less likely.
🚨 Real-World Implications – What Could Go Wrong?
When these clauses aren’t followed, the risks aren’t just theoretical — here’s what can really happen in the wild world of multi-currency contracts:
2017 Outcome: Clear breach of Sub-Clause 14.15. Contractor can file a Claim under Sub-Clause 20.2. Employer has no excuse.
2017 Outcome: The obligation stalls until the Contractor supplies the details. Lesson: Contractors must be proactive!
Both Editions: Silent. Particular Conditions can help—consider a clause allowing agreed alternate currency payments if legal blocks arise.
In uncertain FX environments, add a Particular Condition that allows alternate currency payment at a pre-agreed exchange rate if legal restrictions pop up.
- “Shall be made in that currency” (1999) and “shall pay by direct transfer” (2017) are hard legal obligations, not soft guidelines. Failure can lead to claims, interest on delays, or even suspension (see Sub-Clause 16.1).
- Neither clause defines “proportion” — if your Contract Data is vague, the payment system may break down.
- The 2017 update is better aligned with lender/audit demands: currency-specific accounts make payments traceable.
⚙️ Contractual Leverage: Contractor vs. Employer
Party | What They Gain | What They Risk |
---|---|---|
Contractor | FX protection, predictable procurement, easier cash flow forecasting | Delayed payments if they forget to nominate accounts (2017) |
Employer | Clarity in payment duties, traceable payments | Liability for FX losses, or claims if they deviate from agreed proportions or methods |
Cross-Referencing with Other Clauses
“Who Else Is in the Room When Currency Is on the Table?”
Think of Clause 13.4 and Sub-Clause 14.15 as team captains in the FIDIC payment game. But they don’t work alone — here’s how their teammates help (or complicate!) the play.
🔁 FIDIC 1999: Clause 13.4 & Its Siblings
Sets the contract amount and currency structure. If split currencies are agreed, Clause 13.4 is activated.
Variations (Clause 13.1) must respect these proportions unless otherwise agreed.
Cross-Link: If a Variation adds funds, it usually follows the original split — unless you specify otherwise.
Read: Clause 14.1 The Contract Price (FIDIC Yellow Book 1999)
Contractor’s statements must break down amounts by currency, as per Clause 13.4.
Practical: Submitting a single-currency total may lead to rejection and delay.
Explore: Interim Payment Certificates (FIDIC Yellow Book)
The Engineer must certify the amounts in the right currency mix. Single-currency certificates violate the spirit of Clause 13.4.
Payment must occur within 28 days of the Interim Payment Certificate, and in the correct currency split — not just on time!
📎 FIDIC 2017: Sub-Clause 14.15’s Cross-Functional Family
Sets the contract sum and currency split (now in Contract Data). Adjustments (under 13.3 Variations/13.5 Provisional Sums) should honor this split unless the parties agree otherwise.
Details: Variation Procedure (2017)
Application must be split by currency — no lumping, no arbitrary conversions.
The Engineer must certify each amount in the correct currency. Changing the mix during certification may breach Sub-Clause 3.7 (see 3.7 Explained).
Payment must be made on time and in the correct currency/account as per 14.15. If USD is late but INR is on time, Sub-Clause 14.8 allows for finance charges.
If payment isn’t compliant, the Contractor can claim. Sub-Clause 14.15 is the foundation for this.
Tip: Always attach breakdowns and proof for claims!
💡 Summary Chart – Who Talks to Who?
Clause | Role in Currency Payment | Links to 13.4 / 14.15 |
---|---|---|
14.1 (Both Editions) | Sets initial currency structure | Directly tied to 13.4 / 14.15 |
14.3 | Contractor’s application must honor currency split | 13.4 / 14.15 enforce it |
14.6 | Engineer must certify payments in correct currencies | Relies on accurate application |
14.7 | Employer must pay in stated currencies | Enforced by 13.4 / 14.15 |
20.2 (2017) | Allows claims for payment breaches | 14.15 is the claim foundation |
“Clause 13.4 and Sub-Clause 14.15 are the gatekeepers of currency integrity — but their whole team has to execute for payments to go smoothly.”
What If Scenarios?
💭 “What Could Possibly Go Wrong with Payment in Multiple Currencies?”
Construction is rarely an ideal world! Here’s what happens when payment in applicable currencies goes off script.
Contract Price = ₹70 Cr (INR) + $1.2M (USD)
IPC certified for ₹35 Cr + $600,000.
-
Under FIDIC 1999 (Clause 13.4):
Contractor can object, but Clause 13.4 is vague on remedies. Likely, Contractor must initiate a claim under Clause 20.1.
Frustration Level: High. -
Under FIDIC 2017 (Sub-Clause 14.15):
Clear breach. Contractor can:- File a Claim under Sub-Clause 20.2.1
- Seek FX loss under Sub-Clause 20.2.4
- Claim finance charges under Sub-Clause 14.8 for unpaid USD
Employer pays INR, but holds back EUR waiting for details.
- Under FIDIC 1999: Clause 13.4 doesn’t require account info. Employer delaying EUR may still be a breach, but logistics can get messy.
-
Under FIDIC 2017: Sub-Clause 14.15 makes account details mandatory. If not provided, Employer is right to delay that portion.
Pro Tip: Always include account details in Contract Data or submit them with your first application!
- Under 1999 FIDIC: Clause 13.4 doesn’t cover FX risk after certification. Interest for delayed payment (Clause 14.8) might help, but FX losses are a grey area.
- Under 2017 FIDIC: Sub-Clause 14.15 protects the currency, not value. But Sub-Clause 14.8 lets you claim finance charges, and Sub-Clause 20.2 can support cost claims for actual loss (with proof). Pro Move: Track certification vs. remittance dates, and keep FX rate screenshots from RBI/ECB for claims!
- Under 1999 FIDIC: Clause 13.4 doesn’t address force majeure or currency controls. Contractor is technically entitled to USD, but law may override. Outcome is unclear—you may need to invoke Clause 19 [Force Majeure] and negotiate.
- Under 2017 FIDIC: Sub-Clause 14.15 is strict, but Sub-Clause 19.2 [Exceptional Events] may apply if the restriction is unforeseeable and outside the Employer’s control.
Original Contract: 80% INR / 20% USD — but should the Variation follow this?
- Under 1999 FIDIC: Clause 13.4 applies only to the “Contract Price.” Variations may default to the same split, which could underpay FX costs if not clarified. Risk: big gap if not negotiated up front!
- Under 2017 FIDIC: Integrated with Sub-Clause 13.3 [Variation Procedure] and 14.15. You can and should clarify currency splits during Variation valuation. Engineer’s Determination should reflect the true mix.
- Clause 13.4 (1999): Gives you currency rights, but little enforcement muscle or process detail.
- Sub-Clause 14.15 (2017): Gives you both currency entitlement and the procedural tools to enforce it.
- But in both cases, outcomes hinge on careful contract drafting — especially in the Appendix to Tender / Contract Data and Particular Conditions. Don’t leave the “what ifs” to chance!
✨ Suggestions for Clarity and Improvement
📘 Clause 13.4 – FIDIC 1999: Room for Improvement
“Where the Contract provides for payment of the Contract Price in more than one currency, the proportion of each currency in which the Contract Price is to be paid shall be specified in the Appendix to Tender, and the payment of each such proportion shall be made in that currency.”
- No mention of payment method (direct transfer? cheque? bank draft?)
- No mention of banking details or location
- No clarity on FX regulations or legal restrictions
- Silent on bank charges or deductions
- No fallback if payment in a currency becomes impossible
✔️ Follows GP2 (clearly replaces original)
✔️ Introduces process clarity (banking, timing)
✔️ Allocates cost responsibility
✔️ Adds contingency for FX risks
✔️ Covers Variations & Adjustments
📗 Sub-Clause 14.15 – FIDIC 2017: Still Great, But Can Be Sharpened
“Payment of the amounts due to the Contractor shall be made in the currencies and proportions set out in the Contract. The Contractor shall provide details of the bank accounts into which the payments are to be made, in the relevant currencies. The Employer shall pay the Contractor by direct transfer into these bank accounts.”
- What if Contractor fails to submit account info on time?
- No fallback if FX rules prohibit payment in a foreign currency
- Are Variations/Adjustments payments covered by original split?
- No mention of who pays bank charges/fees
- No deadline for submitting account info
✔️ Adds clarity, preserves original clause (GP2 compliant)
✔️ Sets deadlines and protects Employer if waiting on details
✔️ Handles currency control risk fairly
✔️ Establishes who pays bank charges
🇮🇳 India-Specific Tips for Domestic FIDIC Contracts
- Reference the RBI Master Circular on Forex Transactions for remittances to foreign contractors.
- Explicitly state all foreign currency payments will comply with FEMA and RBI regulations.
- Allow for conversion at the SBI TT Buying Rate if the RBI daily rate is unavailable.
All foreign currency payments shall be subject to compliance with the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and applicable RBI notifications. In case of ambiguity, the exchange rate shall be taken as the SBI TT Buying Rate prevailing on the date of Interim Payment Certificate.
“A beautifully worded clause is only as good as the clarity it brings in the middle of a cash-flow crisis.”
- Protects both parties from legal gray zones
- Aligns with FIDIC’s Golden Principles (GP1 & GP2)
- Builds a more robust, bankable, and FX-resilient contract
✅ Can the Contractor Provide Separate Bank Accounts for Different Currencies?
“The Contractor shall provide details of the bank accounts into which the payments are to be made, in the relevant currencies. The Employer shall pay the Contractor by direct transfer into these bank accounts.”
- The wording allows the Contractor to specify different accounts for different currencies.
- There’s no rule that all accounts must be in the project country.
- What matters is each currency has its designated recipient account.
✅ Why Is This Done in Practice?
- Paying site wages, local suppliers, GST, utilities, etc.
- Reduces conversion charges and keeps local cash flow smooth.
- For repatriating profit, paying overseas suppliers, servicing foreign loans, or linking to parent company treasury.
An Italian contractor working in Mumbai may provide:
• An ICICI INR account in India
• A EUR account with UniCredit Bank in Milan
- FEMA compliance: Outward remittance must follow RBI norms, typically via Form A2 & supporting docs.
- Tax Deducted at Source (TDS): Employer must withhold/apply tax before foreign payment.
- Contractor’s Instructions: Clearly specify account name, SWIFT/IBAN, bank address, and account currency.
“By separating payment flows, you reduce financial friction, simplify compliance, and keep everyone’s auditors happy.”
📄 Particular Conditions Clause: Multi-Currency Bank Account Instructions
(Addition to Sub-Clause 14.15 – Currencies of Payment)
• Follows GP2: Addition, not replacement—retains original FIDIC logic.
• Both parties protected (clear process for payment, info, and FX compliance).
• RBI/FEMA ready—easily customized for Indian requirements.
• Claims-resistant—avoids payment friction due to missing banking info.
• Suitable for Part A or Part B of Particular Conditions.
📄 Particular Conditions Clause: Multi-Currency Bank Account Instructions
(Replacement of Clause 13.4 – Payment in Applicable Currencies)
• GP2 compliant—clear replacement.
• Removes ambiguity (payment process, charges, FX hurdles).
• Ready for India and other multi-currency jurisdictions.
• Covers Variations and Adjustments.
✅ Enhanced Particular Conditions Clause
Title: Multi-Currency Payment and Bank Account Instructions Clause
(Addition to Sub-Clause 14.15 – Currencies of Payment. GP2-compliant: adds to, not replaces, the original clause.)
✅ How This Clause Complies with the FIDIC Golden Principles
Golden Principle | Compliance Explained |
---|---|
GP1: Recognizable FIDIC Contract Form | Clause builds directly on Sub-Clause 14.15 without altering its framework. Terminology and structure match FIDIC standards. |
GP2: Clear identification of modifications | Clearly states: “This clause adds to, but does not replace…” ensuring full transparency of modification to the General Conditions. |
GP3: Parties’ roles, obligations, and risks clearly defined | – Contractor must provide account details. – Employer must pay accordingly. – Risk of delay shifted clearly based on each party’s performance. |
GP4: Employer’s role through the Engineer maintained | Engineer is copied on banking instructions (per 14.15’s implied payment flow and Sub-Clause 3.7). Engineer can verify compliance. |
GP5: Dispute avoidance and amicable resolution encouraged | Introduces a “consultation and agreement” fallback if currency payments become unlawful—helps prevent claims escalation. |
[Only for contracts executed in India or where RBI regulations apply]
All foreign currency payments from the Employer shall be subject to compliance with applicable Indian law, including the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), and shall be accompanied by the Contractor’s invoice and Form A2 as per RBI remittance norms. The exchange rate used for any required conversion shall be the RBI Reference Rate on the date the Interim Payment Certificate was issued.
📄 Particular Conditions Clause (FIDIC 1999 Edition)
(Replacement of Clause 13.4 – Payment in Applicable Currencies. Compliant with GP2.)
✅ FIDIC Golden Principle Compliance Checklist (1999 Edition)
Golden Principle | How It’s Applied |
---|---|
GP1: Contract remains recognizable as FIDIC | Uses standard clause numbering, structure, and terminology. Mirrors original Clause 13.4 while expanding functionality. |
GP2: Modifications must be clearly stated | Begins with “This clause replaces Clause 13.4…” – full transparency of change. |
GP3: Parties’ roles and obligations are clear | Contractor must nominate accounts; Employer must pay correctly. Risks and duties are well-distributed. |
GP4: Engineer’s role preserved | Engineer is kept in the loop as per the Contract’s standard information flow. |
GP5: Supports dispute avoidance | Introduces fallback mechanism in case of FX restrictions to prevent claim escalation. Encourages negotiation before confrontation. |
Foreign currency payments shall comply with applicable Indian foreign exchange laws and regulations, including the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the RBI Master Directions on remittances. In such cases, the applicable exchange rate shall be the RBI Reference Rate on the date the relevant payment certificate is issued.
✅ Payment in Applicable Currencies – Clause Administration Checklist
# | Checklist Item | Applies To | ✔ |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Contract Price is split into two or more currencies (e.g., local + foreign) and stated clearly in Appendix to Tender or Contract Data | 1999 & 2017 | |
2 | Currency proportions (e.g., 70% INR, 30% USD) are clearly defined and sum up to 100% | 1999 & 2017 | |
3 | Contractor has submitted separate bank account details for each currency, including SWIFT/IBAN | 2017 only (optional for 1999) | |
4 | Bank accounts are located in correct jurisdictions (local for local currency, offshore for foreign) | 1999 & 2017 | |
5 | Payment applications (under Clause 14.3) are broken down per currency | 1999 & 2017 | |
6 | Engineer’s Interim Payment Certificate (Clause 14.6) reflects the certified amounts in correct currency mix | 1999 & 2017 | |
7 | Employer pays each currency into the designated account via direct bank transfer (no currency substitutions) | 2017 only | |
8 | If Contractor failed to submit account details, payment for that portion is rightfully withheld (no interest payable) | 2017 only | |
9 | Banking charges, intermediary bank fees, and FX deductions are clearly allocated (ideally to Employer) in Particular Conditions | 1999 & 2017 | |
10 | Fallback mechanism in place if foreign currency payment is blocked due to regulatory change (e.g., FEMA/RBI) | 1999 & 2017 | |
11 | Variations or adjustments to Contract Price are paid in same currency ratio unless otherwise agreed in writing | 1999 & 2017 | |
12 | Sub-Clause 20.2 Claim process followed if currency payment is delayed, incorrect, or substituted | 2017 only | |
13 | Contractor retains documentation to prove exchange losses or FX impacts for potential claims | 1999 & 2017 | |
14 | All amendments to Clause 13.4 or 14.15 follow FIDIC GP2 – explicitly stating whether clause is added to, replaced, or modified | 1999 & 2017 | |
15 | All payment-related clauses (14.1 to 14.8) consistently reflect the same currency logic | 1999 & 2017 |
📄 Sample Letter 1: Submission of Bank Account Details for Multi-Currency Payments
Currency | Account Name | Bank | SWIFT/IBAN | Country |
---|---|---|---|---|
[INR] | [ABC Ltd] | [HDFC Bank, Mumbai] | [HDFCINBBXXX] | India |
[USD] | [ABC Ltd] | [Bank of America] | [BOFAUS3NXXX] | USA |
[EUR] | [ABC GmbH] | [Deutsche Bank] | [DEUTDEFFXXX] | Germany |