Understanding Clause 12.2 Delayed Tests in FIDIC Yellow Book 1999

Comprehensive Analysis of Clause 12.2 Delayed Tests

Purpose and Implications

Clause 12.2 is designed to protect the Contractor from the financial implications of delays in conducting Tests after Completion that are not their fault. Specifically, it outlines the procedure for the Contractor to claim additional costs and a reasonable profit in the event of such delays.

Example:

In a construction project in New York, suppose a Contractor is ready to perform post-completion safety tests on a newly built skyscraper. However, the Employer delays these tests due to bureaucratic red tape. According to local building codes, these safety tests must be performed within a 30-day period after construction completion. Clause 12.2 would enable the Contractor to claim additional costs incurred during this delay.

Primary Aspects

1. Notice to the Engineer: The Contractor must inform the Engineer of any incurred costs due to delays.
2. Engineer’s Determination: The Engineer must then proceed according to Sub-Clause 3.5 [Determinations] to decide on the claim.
3. Deemed Passed: If the tests can’t be completed during the Defects Notification Period, the Works are deemed to have passed the tests.

Regulatory Context:

In the North United States, federal and state environmental laws might require specific tests for building materials, such as asbestos tests, which must be completed within a set timeframe. Clause 12.2 ensures that delays in such mandatory tests do not financially burden the Contractor.

Trending

Taking Over Certificate & Retention Money Explained | Contract Expert Tips

Technical Standards:

The ANSI (American National Standards Institute) sets various construction and safety standards that might require testing. Clause 12.2 would be applicable if these tests are delayed.

Main Points to Keep in Mind

1. Timely Notice: The Contractor must give timely notice to the Engineer to claim any additional costs.
2. Documentation: Keeping thorough records of all communications and incurred costs is crucial for substantiating any claims.

Diverse Interpretations of Clause 12.2 Delayed Tests

Interpretation 1: Protective Measure for Contractors

• Purpose: To protect Contractors from incurring financial losses due to delays in Tests after Completion that are beyond their control.
• Implications: Enables Contractors to claim additional costs and reasonable profits.
• Expert Opinion: Contractors should proactively document any delays and associated costs to make a strong case for their claims.

Interpretation 2: Checks and Balances

• Purpose: To ensure that both parties are accountable for timely execution of post-completion tests.
• Implications: Puts the onus on the Employer to avoid delays; otherwise, they bear the financial consequences.
• Expert Opinion: Employers should plan these tests well in advance to avoid costly delays.

Interpretation 3: Legal Safeguard

• Purpose: To provide a legal framework for resolving disputes arising from delays in Tests after Completion.
• Implications: Formalizes the process for claiming additional costs, thereby reducing the scope for disputes.
• Expert Opinion: Legal experts recommend that both parties explicitly define what constitutes ‘unreasonable delay’ to avoid ambiguity.

Interpretation 4: Operational Efficiency

• Purpose: To encourage timely completion of all contractual obligations, including Tests after Completion.
• Implications: Promotes operational efficiency by penalizing delays, thereby encouraging both parties to stick to the timeline.
• Expert Opinion: Project managers should integrate these testing timelines into their overall project schedules to ensure smooth operations.

Interaction with Other Clauses

Clause 5.7 Operation and Maintenance Manuals

• Connection: Adherence to the manuals specified in Clause 5.7 ensures that the Tests after Completion under Clause 12.2 are standardized.
• Detailed Explanation: By following these manuals, both parties can ensure that the tests meet industry standards and regulatory requirements. This minimizes the scope for disputes over the quality or procedure of the tests.

Clause 8.7 Delay Damages

• Connection: Clause 12.2 has a direct impact on Clause 8.7, as delays in conducting Tests after Completion could lead to delay damages.
• Detailed Explanation: If the Employer is responsible for delays in testing, they could potentially face delay damages under this clause. Hence, there’s a financial incentive for the Employer to avoid delays.

Clause 11.9 Performance Certificate

• Connection: The issuance of the Performance Certificate under Clause 11.9 triggers the need for Tests after Completion, as outlined in Clause 12.2.
• Detailed Explanation: This interaction ensures that the project isn’t considered complete until both the Performance Certificate is issued and the necessary tests are conducted, offering an additional layer of quality assurance.

Clause 11.10 Unfulfilled Obligations

• Connection: Both Clause 12.2 and Clause 11.10 deal with responsibilities that extend beyond the project’s completion.
• Detailed Explanation: These clauses together create a framework that protects both parties by specifying ongoing responsibilities even after the project appears to be complete.

Clause 20.1 Claims

• Connection: Clause 12.2 could serve as a basis for legal claims under Clause 20.1.
• Detailed Explanation: If there are disagreements or financial repercussions due to delays in tests, either party can use this clause to initiate a formal dispute resolution process.

Clause 3.5 Determinations

• Connection: This clause may be invoked to make formal determinations in case of disagreements or disputes related to Clause 12.2.
• Detailed Explanation: This gives both parties a formal process for resolving any disputes that may arise, thereby reducing the potential for prolonged or contentious legal battles.

Flowchart

Start: Implementing Clause 12.2

The flowchart begins with the initiation of Clause 12.2, which is the focal point for delayed tests in a construction project under the FIDIC Yellow Book 1999. From this point, the process diverges into four main pathways: Communication, Monitoring, Management, and Legal Consultation.

Communication

1. Clear Expectations: This block represents the need for setting clear expectations between the Contractor and the Employer.

   • Contractor: The contractor must understand the scope and requirements of the tests.
   • Employer: The employer should be aware of the timelines and any potential delays.

2. Open Channels: This signifies the importance of maintaining open communication channels.

   • Stakeholders: All stakeholders, including subcontractors and regulatory bodies, should be kept in the loop.

Monitoring

1. Document Delays: This block emphasizes the importance of documenting any delays in tests.

   • Reasons for Delay: The specific reasons for the delay should be documented for future reference and potential claims.

2. Update Schedule: Any delays should be immediately reflected in the project schedule.

   • Manage Risks: Risk management strategies should be updated to account for the new timelines.

Management

1. Impact on Timelines: This block focuses on how delays in tests can impact the project timelines.

   • Contingency Plans: Plans should be in place to mitigate the impact of delays.

2. Impact on Budget: Delays often have financial implications.

   • Financial Review: A thorough financial review should be conducted to assess the impact.

Legal Consultation

1. Legal Implications: Legal advice should be sought to understand the implications of invoking Clause 12.2.

   • Contractual Obligations: Understand how the clause affects other contractual obligations.

2. Compliance: Ensure that the delayed tests do not result in non-compliance with laws.

   • Regulatory Compliance: In the United States, this could involve EPA regulations, building codes, and other environmental laws.

Interaction with Other Clauses

This block represents how Clause 12.2 interacts with other clauses in the contract.

• Clause 8: Commencement, Delays, and Suspension
• Clause 20.1: Claims
• Clause 4.12: Unforeseeable Physical Conditions

Detailed Explanation of the Flowchart

1. Start: Contractor Incurs Cost Due to Delay in Tests After Completion
   • This step initiates when the Contractor faces additional costs because the Employer unreasonably delays the Tests after Completion.
2. Contractor Gives Notice to Engineer
   • Upon incurring such costs, the Contractor is required to formally notify the Engineer about the delay and the consequent costs.
3. Contractor Entitled to Payment of Cost Plus Profit
   • Following the notification, the Contractor becomes entitled to a payment that covers the incurred costs plus a reasonable profit. This entitlement is subject to the provisions of Sub-Clause 20.1, which deals with the Contractor’s Claims.
4. Engineer Proceeds in Accordance with Sub-Clause 3.5
   • After receiving the notice, the Engineer must proceed as per Sub-Clause 3.5, which involves making determinations regarding the claim.
5. Agreement or Determination of Cost and Profit by Engineer
   • The Engineer, following the guidelines of Sub-Clause 3.5, either agrees with the Contractor’s claim or determines the cost and profit to be included in the Contract Price.
6. If Tests Can’t be Completed for Reasons Not Attributable to Contractor, Works/Section Deemed Passed
   • If the Tests after Completion cannot be completed within the Defects Notification Period, or any other mutually agreed period, for reasons not attributable to the Contractor, then the Works or the Section in question is deemed to have passed these Tests.
7. End Process
   • The process concludes once the above steps are completed, either with the deemed passing of the Tests or the determination/agreement of the cost and profit.

📜: Case Studies on Clause 12.2 Delayed Tests

Case Study 1: Delay Due to Environmental Regulations in North United States

• Scenario: A construction project in Michigan faced delays in Tests after Completion due to new, unexpected environmental regulations.
• Application of Clause 12.2: The Contractor gave notice to the Engineer and claimed additional costs for the delay.
• Outcome: The Engineer agreed to the additional costs plus reasonable profit, as per Clause 12.2.
• Detailed Explanation: This case illustrates the importance of Clause 12.2 as a protective measure for Contractors against unforeseen regulations that could cause delays.

Case Study 2: Employer’s Financial Constraints

• Scenario: A public infrastructure project in New York experienced delays in Tests after Completion due to the Employer’s financial constraints.
• Application of Clause 12.2: The Contractor invoked Clause 12.2 to claim additional costs and reasonable profit.
• Outcome: The Employer had to bear the additional costs, as specified under Clause 12.2.
• Detailed Explanation: This case underlines how Clause 12.2 holds the Employer accountable for any delays that are not the Contractor’s fault.

Case Study 3: Dispute Over ‘Unreasonable Delay’

• Scenario: In a Texas-based energy project, the Employer argued that the delays in Tests after Completion were not ‘unreasonable’ and hence not liable for additional costs.
• Application of Clause 12.2: The Contractor disagreed and invoked Clause 20.1 Claims and Clause 3.5 Determinations to settle the dispute.
• Outcome: The dispute went to arbitration, and it was determined that the Employer was at fault, thereby validating the Contractor’s claim under Clause 12.2.
• Detailed Explanation: This showcases the role of Clause 12.2 as a legal framework for resolving disputes related to delays in Tests after Completion.

Sample Letters Related to Clause 12.2

Letter 1: Contractor Notifying Engineer of Delays in Tests

[Your Company]
[Your Address]
[Date]

[Engineer’s Company]
[Engineer’s Address]

Subject: Notice of Delay in Tests after Completion as per Clause 12.2

Dear [Engineer’s Name],

We are writing to formally notify you of delays in conducting the Tests after Completion for Project [Project Name], Contract No. [Contract Number].

As per Clause 12.2 of the FIDIC Yellow Book 1999, we are entitled to claim additional costs and reasonable profit due to these delays. We request that you acknowledge this notice and proceed as stipulated under the contract.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Position]

Letter 2: Engineer Acknowledging Contractor’s Claim

[Engineer’s Company]
[Engineer’s Address]
[Date]

[Your Company]
[Your Address]

Subject: Acknowledgment of Your Notice on Delay in Tests after Completion

Dear [Your Name],

We have received your notice dated [Date of Contractor’s Letter] regarding the delays in Tests after Completion for Project [Project Name], Contract No. [Contract Number].

We acknowledge your claim under Clause 12.2 and will proceed as stipulated under the contract.

Sincerely,
[Engineer’s Name]
[Engineer’s Position]

Checklists for Clause 12.2

Checklist 1: Proficient Execution of Clause 12.2

Checklist 2: Applying and Overseeing Clause 12.2

Checklist 3: Monitoring the Execution of Clause 12.2

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Clause 12.2

1. What does Clause 12.2 cover?

   • It covers the rights of the Contractor to claim additional costs and reasonable profit if there are unreasonable delays in Tests after Completion.

2. Who is responsible for the delays?

   • If the Employer is responsible for the delays, the Contractor can claim additional costs and reasonable profit.

3. What constitutes ‘unreasonable delay’?

   • This is usually subject to interpretation and may require legal advice. It is often determined by the Engineer.

4. How does Clause 12.2 interact with other clauses?

   • It interacts with Clauses 5.7, 8.7, 11.9, 11.10, 20.1, and 3.5, among others, to create a comprehensive legal framework for dealing with delays in Tests after Completion.

Common Misunderstandings

• Misunderstanding 1: Any delay qualifies for additional costs.
  • Clarification: The delay has to be ‘unreasonable’ and attributable to the Employer.
• Misunderstanding 2: The Engineer determines the ‘reasonable profit’.
  • Clarification: While the Engineer may contribute to this determination, it usually involves negotiation between the Employer and the Contractor.